Press "Enter" to skip to content

Meaning Of Life

Meaning Of Life Is there a meaning to life? First, to clear up any misunderstandings in the next few paragraphs you are about to read, I shall explain a few things. I am not talking about the individual people in our lives, that mean so much to us, or individual lives. That is a whole other matter. What I mean by the “meaning of life”, is the greater picture. There are people all over the world, doing their own thing, living their own lives, in their own areas.

Is there a point to this? The people themselves, benefit from learning and having experiences while they’re alive, but then they die, and all they have accomplished, ends. Then the process begins all over again with the next generation. So one purpose for life is established. We are here to reproduce. It has been genetically coded into us, and with little prompting, we continue to produce tiny versions of ourselves.

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.
Any subject. Any type of essay.
We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.


Get your price

But, is there a POINT to this? Well, I solemnly believe not. Some people say the point of life, is to have fun and make others happy. Righto then. Sure, that’s a good thing to do, I don’t disagree with that. But in terms of the big picture, what does it exactly accomplish? A person lives their life, has fun, and perhaps has the knack of making lots of other people happy in the process, then that person dies.

And so eventually, do all the other people they brought happiness to. And through different generations come people who have the same philosophy…same thing, just happening later in time, with different people. Nothing has been accomplished..So, this obviously cannot be the point of life, unless it’s inventor has the same intellect as that of pond scum. I would like to think otherwise, so I am interested in finding another answer. Other people believe that God is the point of life. God gives us a booklet of rules and regulations, for us to be eligible to receive his personal ‘attention’. We respect his wishes and act accordingly, as to how we believe he would like us to act.

Then, it is thought, he looks after us and takes care of us. I find this theory hard to grasp..God, usually, is seen as this great celestial being, that is far more advanced and powerful than any person here on Earth. He has these ‘talents’ and powers by simply..not being one of us. So, there’s God…Way up there, looking down upon us. Earth must seem like a little ant farm to him.

If he’s up there, looking down and watching over us, how is it so many horrible things happen in the world? Some of you may say it’s because the people that these things happened to, weren’t behaving how they should have been, how God would have liked them to. Or that God allows us to make choices, good or bad. Ok, then that would mean to me that God is an unforgiving and unsympathetic, celestial meanie. Why should he watch us create misery, see wars break out, while he remains aloof, superior and more powerful than us? I say that’s unfair. Perhaps one reason for him would be, because it’s more ‘fun’ to us be so ‘handicapped’ in the celestial scheme of things. It provides more entertainment, more adventure, and it’s harder. And because it’s harder, he knows there will be more rewards for us when we succeed in being “good”.

Something is obviously amiss with this plan, since we continue to do the same things over and over again through the generations, and centuries. We just do not learn this particular philosophy of his. Perhaps he could have let us work the controls? Do you think God has been GOOD at it? Heck no. Look at the world’s history..It hasn’t exactly been a bed full of roses. Sure, God tried.

But while the footy game was on tv, he forgot to cut some of the thorns off the roses when he was preparing Earth’s future. You reckon we could do any worse? I don’t think so. Seems to me we’d all have just as much luck, even more so, at running a world, than God would. Even if God really was this powerful, wise, kind and forgiving fellow, why is he running a world? He obviously hasn’t succeeded in achieving much. Humanity hasn’t made any real accomplishments (I’m not talking technology..I’m talking about discovering anything that would lead us to understanding why we are here at all).

What’s in it for him, to be our celestial babysitter? Is it to see the reward of us succeeding, and being ‘at one’ with ourselves? If that was it, then when will somebody please explain to him that that’s impossible, unless he renders us all as vegetables. Humans have been given a mind that allows us to think, to ponder, to contemplate. If we are in a thinking state, don’t you think SOMETHING will come across our minds, in the period of existing and experiencing that will trigger off a thought of not being, so ‘pleased-as-punch’ with ourselves? Highly likely, I would say. Maybe God wants us to ‘learn’ from our mistakes, and that is the challenge/point of life? If that’s the case, God is not as wise as we all thought. The lucky people that do learn their important lessons through life, all inevitably die, and so too, does their knowledge and experiences.

Ah, but what about history text, you say. I don’t know about you, but I’ve noticed that we, as a people, tend to only ‘really’ understand the importance of lessons until we’ve learnt them ourselves. First generation learns, profits from that information, then dies. Second generation, does the same thing. Nothing gained in the big picture there. You might say the answer to this ‘going around the mulberry bush’, might be for the young people to simply take heed of what their elders say, no questions asked.

Meaning of life

Jermaine Smith
Period 7
The True Meaning of Life
What is the meaning of life? Well known Greek philosphers such as Socrates and Plato believed that our purpose in this life was to gain knowledge in preparation for the next life. Other Philosophers such as Epicurus believed that pleasure is the main goal in life. After giving these ideas lots of thought, I have come to my own conclusion that the true meaning of life is far more complex than either of these; far too complex for any human to fully comprehend. In fact these two different philosophies are only part of the grand picture. If it were that easy for men to figure out our lives wouldn’t be so messed up now. The meaning of life revolves around many different things. I think these things include: self-understanding, development of mind and soul, and an afterlife.
According to Epicurus, pleasure was the meaning of life. His ideas of life were completely opposite of Plato. Epicurus, in my opinion was a little bit niave and narrow minded in his view on the subject. He would say that the meaning of likfe was to experience pleasure until the end of your existence. He did not believe in an afterlife or that a person had a soul that lived forever. He just thought when you are gone that’s it. I disagree with all of that because I have many religious beliefs from which I derive the meaning of life. One of these beliefs is that there is life after death, and that there is one supreme being of the universe. This goes back to Aristotle’s first mover theory. I would however agree that life is a balancing act between pain and pleasure; or good and evil. You can’t have one without the other. For every thing in existence there is always something of opposition.
Another ancient Greek philosopher was Socrates. Socrates said “the unexamined life is not worth living.” I agree with this in a sense that if you can’t look back at your life and be proud of your accomplishments, then everything that you ever did was in vain. You have to be able to look at the mistakes you have made and be able to learn from that or you are doomed to repeat those mistakes. Maybe on a deeper level Socrates might have been talking about analyizing the purpose of one’s life. This in my opinion is just as important. I feel that in order for me to succeed in life I have to at least examine the meaning of my being. I believe that it comes to a point in every persons life where they sit back and think “why am I here?” Whether it happens often or not, I wouldn’t believe any person of sane health that said they never once thought about it. Socrates also said that “the good of life is knowledge.” He believed in a higher good in life that could be achieved through an endless search for knowledge. His definition of higher good was when virtue and knowledge united. Although I agree that what Socrates speaks of is an important part of living, I would not go so far as to say it is the reason for liveing. I say this partially because of my definition of knowledge. I see knowledge not as just to be found in the universe, but in a way created by humans not unlike myself. Many things that are classified as knowledge such as: language, mathematics, and history are all human created. Our language was created by people in earlier civilizations, as well as mathematics. History is the story of these early people and civilizations. Should I assume that my reason for living is to learn of someone else’s life? If so, what was that person’s meaning for living? Undoubtitly these things are of tremendous value to our civilization and how we live. But I ask myself once again how does it relate to “why we live.” As far as Socrates belief in a higher good, I agree 100%. I honestly believe that there is a higher good that can be achieved but not just through the search of knowledge. My theory of how higher good can be achieved is that a person must fully understand themself. That is when a person is able to recognize their potentiol and develop it. They also have to be able to relinquish any doubt they have about themself. One must commit to their spirituallity. Finally they have to become physically stronger. Not meant to offend anyone, but the highest good to me, is the best that you can be. A weak body is vulnerable and doesn’t complete a person as a whole. An interesting connection to that is how it is said that humans only use a small fraction of their brain. I believe when someone can tap into the rest of their brain, they will be close to if not at their highest good.

Last but not least we have the philosopher Plato, who was the pupil of Socrates. Therefore many of their ideas are similiar if not identical. Plato also believed that knowledge was the most essential part of life. He thought that learning and knowing the truth was the only way to achieve perfection, and striving for perfection was the goal of life. I believe Plato may have been on to something. I have made it in one of my personnal philosophies in life to strive for perfection. Although deep in the back of my mind I know it is unattainable I still try like it is. This reminds me of a quote that I read that said “aim for the moon, fore even if you miss you will land among the stars.” I just means to improve you have to set your standards high. Once again that is only part of the bigger picture that is called life. Striving for wholeness and perfection, as I percieve are mere steps to achieving a higher good, and therefore are not the cumulative meaning of life. Plato was probaby the philosopher I most agree with. He also believed in an after life and preparation for it. But I don’t particularly agree with him when he say that a higher good could only be accomplished by giving up all pleasure. Obviously there has to be some sacrifice, but to give up all pleasure would be to give up on what you are trying to accomplish. I think of pleasure as one of the most powerful motivating forces ikn life. Whether it be intellectual of physical a person has to be able to enjoy what they are doing to excel above and beyond. Even Plato had to in some way had to enjoy philosophizing or he probably wouldn’t do it.

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.
Any subject. Any type of essay.
We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.


Get your price

It is now evident that the meaning of life has to far more complex for any one person to fully understand. All these ideas of these different philosophers are not necessarily inaccurate, just incomplete. All peices to a puzzle that I have no way of fully figuring out. Socrates spoke of a higher good to be achieved. Nobody has seemed to accomplish this yet in life. There are so many obstacles that we face as we try to achieve a higher good. Many of these are based in the fact that we are human beings, and because of that are flawed by the ways of our culture. Things such as self-doubt, worry, ignorance, and the values put into our heads since the day we were born all are road blocks on our way to a higher level. Also being human beings makes vulnerable to the ways of the world around us, so it is not easy to block these things out of our lives. In a summary I believe this life to be stage in which we are to develop our minds, bodies, and souls to their highest potential in preparation for the afterlife. A person living by this philosophy would probably become a genius or great thinker. But like Eupicures, Aristotle, Socrates, and Plato I could only form my own opinions of the subject. There isn’t anyway for me to figure out whether I am right or wrong. Only God could ever really know the true meaning.

x

Hi!
I'm Lily

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out